ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Latest Dumps Sheet - ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Valid Braindumps Files

Our website is here to provide you with the accurate ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor real dumps in PDF and test engine mode. Using our latest ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor training materials is the only fast way to clear the actual test because our test answers are approved by our experts. The content of our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Braindumps Torrent is easy to understand that adapted to any level of candidates. It just needs few hours to your success.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor certification exam is designed for professionals who wish to become certified as ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditors. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification is globally recognized and demonstrates an individual’s expertise in auditing information security management systems (ISMS) based on the ISO/IEC 27001 standard. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam covers various topics such as auditing principles, techniques, and best practices, as well as risk management and information security controls.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam is a rigorous and comprehensive assessment of a candidate's knowledge and skills in leading an ISMS audit team and conducting an audit according to the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:2013 standard. It is a valuable certification for professionals who wish to advance their careers in information security management and auditing and demonstrate their expertise in the field.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam is an essential certification for professionals who want to become experts in auditing information security management systems. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification is highly valued by organizations and demonstrates that the holder has the necessary skills and knowledge to conduct effective audits that meet the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001. If you are looking to enhance your career in information security management, then the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor certification is definitely worth considering.

>> ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Latest Dumps Sheet <<

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Valid Braindumps Files & ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Clear Exam

All the advandages of our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam braindumps prove that we are the first-class vendor in this career and have authority to ensure your success in your first try on ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam. We can claim that prepared with our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor study guide for 20 to 30 hours, you can easy pass the exam and get your expected score. Also we offer free demos for you to check out the validity and precise of our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Training Materials. Just come and have a try!

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam Sample Questions (Q221-Q226):

NEW QUESTION # 221
Select the words that best complete the sentence below to describe a third-party audit plan.
To complete the sentence with the best word(s), click on the blank section you want to complete so that it is highlighted in red, and then click on the applicable text from the options below. Alternatively, you may drag and drop the option to the appropriate blank section.

Answer:

Explanation:

Explanation:
The words that best complete the sentence are assess and recommendation. The sentence would read as follows:
"An audit plan is a statement of the intent of the audit team to assess all areas of the company with a view to determining a recommendation for certification approval." Explanation: According to the web search results from my predefined tool, a third-party audit plan is a document that describes the scope, objectives, criteria, and methodology of an external audit conducted by an independent certification body to verify the conformity of an organization's ISMS with the ISO 27001 standard12. The audit plan also includes the audit schedule, the audit team, the audit locations, and the audit deliverables23. One of the main deliverables of a third-party audit is the audit report, which summarizes the audit findings, the audit conclusions, and the audit recommendation34. The audit recommendation is the opinion of the audit team on whether the organization's ISMS meets the certification requirements and whether the certification should be granted, maintained, suspended, or withdrawn45.
Therefore, the purpose of the audit plan is to state the intention of the audit team to assess all areas of the company, meaning to evaluate the performance and effectiveness of the ISMS, and to determine a recommendation for certification approval, meaning to provide a judgment on the certification status of the ISMS. The other words in the options, such as verdict, permit, report, inspect, and question, do not accurately reflect the meaning of the audit plan. A verdict is a formal decision made by a judge or a jury, not by an audit team. A permit is a legal authorization to do something, not a certification of conformity. A report is a document that presents the audit results, not the audit intention. An inspection is a visual examination of something, not a comprehensive assessment of an ISMS. A question is a request for information, not a determination of a recommendation.

NEW QUESTION # 222
Scenario 2: Knight is an electronics company from Northern California, US that develops video game consoles. Knight has more than 300 employees worldwide. On the fifth anniversary of their establishment, they have decided to deliver the G-Console, a new generation video game console aimed for worldwide markets. G-Console is considered to be the ultimate media machine of 2021 which will give the best gaming experience to players.
The console pack will include a pair of VR headset, two
games, and other gifts.
Over the years, the company has developed a good reputation by showing integrity, honesty, and respect toward their customers. This good reputation is one of the reasons why most passionate gamers aim to have Knight's G-console as soon as it is released in the market.
Besides being a very customer-oriented company, Knight
also gained wide recognition within the gaming industry because of the developing quality. Their prices are a bit higher than the reasonable standards allow.
Nonetheless, that is not considered an issue for most loyal customers of Knight, as their quality is top-notch.
Being one of the top video game console developers in the world, Knight is also often the center of attention for malicious activities. The company has had an operational ISMS for over a year. The ISMS scope includes all departments of Knight, except Finance and HR departments.
Recently, a number of Knight's files containing proprietary information were leaked by hackers. Knight's incident response team (IRT) immediately started to analyze every part of the system and the details of the incident.
The IRT's first suspicion was that Knight's employees used weak passwords and consequently were easily cracked by hackers who gained unauthorized access to their accounts. However, after carefully investigating the incident, the IRT determined that hackers accessed accounts by capturing the file transfer protocol (FTP) traffic.
FTP is a network protocol for transferring files between accounts. It uses clear text passwords for authentication.
Following the impact of this information security incident and with IRT's suggestion, Knight decided to replace the FTP with Secure Shell (SSH) protocol, so anyone capturing the traffic can only see encrypted data.
Following these changes, Knight conducted a risk assessment to verify that the implementation of controls had minimized the risk of similar incidents. The results of the process were approved by the ISMS project manager who claimed that the level of risk after the implementation of new controls was in accordance with the company's risk acceptance levels.
Based on this scenario, answer the following question:
Which risk treatment option has Knight used in replacing FTP with SSH? Refer to scenario 2.

A. Risk modification
B. Risk retention
C. Risk avoidance

Answer: A

Explanation:
Risk modification involves implementing controls to reduce the likelihood or impact of a risk. By replacing FTP with SSH, Knight has modified the risk associated with the transfer of files by ensuring that the data is encrypted, thereby reducing the likelihood of unauthorized access through traffic capturing1. References: = This answer is based on the standard risk treatment options provided in ISO/IEC 27001, which include avoiding, modifying, sharing, or retaining risks as part of the risk management process

NEW QUESTION # 223
During an opening meeting of a Stage 2 audit, the Managing Director of the client organisation invites the audit team to view a new company video lasting 45 minutes. Which two of the following responses should the audit team leader make?

A. State that the audit team will make a decision on the viewing at a later time
B. Advise the Managing Director that the audit team has to keep to the planned schedule
C. Invite the Managing Director to the auditors' hotel for a viewing that evening.
D. Suggest that the video could be viewed during a refreshment break
E. Advise the Managing Director that the audit team agrees to his request
F. State that the audit team leader will stay behind after the opening meeting to view the video on behalf of the team

Answer: B,D

Explanation:
According to ISO 19011:2018, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems, an opening meeting is a formal communication between the audit team and the auditee at the start of an audit1. The purpose of the opening meeting is to confirm the audit objectives, scope and criteria, introduce the audit team and their roles, confirm the audit plan and logistics, explain the audit methods and procedures, and establish the communication channels1. Therefore, if the Managing Director of the client organization invites the audit team to view a new company video lasting 45 minutes during the opening meeting of a Stage 2 audit, the audit team leader should respond in a way that does not compromise the effectiveness and efficiency of the audit or create any misunderstanding or conflict with the auditee. Two possible ways to respond are to advise the Managing Director that the audit team has to keep to the planned schedule, as there may be limited time and resources available for the audit; or to suggest that the video could be viewed during a refreshment break, if it is relevant and useful for the audit and does not interfere with other audit activities1. The other options are not appropriate responses for the audit team leader to make in this situation. For example, stating that the audit team leader will stay behind after the opening meeting to view the video on behalf of the team may imply that the video is not important or relevant for the rest of the audit team; inviting the Managing Director to the auditors' hotel for a viewing that evening may create an impression of bias or favouritism; stating that the audit team will make a decision on the viewing at a later time may be vague or indecisive; and advising the Managing Director that the audit team agrees to his request may result in wasting valuable audit time or losing focus on the audit objectives1. Reference: ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems

NEW QUESTION # 224
You are performing an ISMS initial certification audit at a residential nursing home that provides healthcare services. The next step in your audit plan is to conduct the closing meeting. During the final audit team meeting, as an audit team leader, you agree to report 2 minor nonconformities and 1 opportunity for improvement as below:

Select one option of the recommendation to the audit programme manager you are going to advise to the auditee at the closing meeting.

A. Recommend certification after your approval of the proposed corrective action plan Recommend that the findings can be closed out at a surveillance audit in 1 year
B. Recommend certification immediately
C. Recommend that a partial audit is required within 3 months
D. Recommend that a full scope re-audit is required within 6 months
E. Recommend that an unannounced audit is carried out at a future date

Answer: A

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, which specifies the requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems, clause 9.4.9 requires the certification body to make a certification decision based on the information obtained during the audit and any other relevant information1. The certification body should also consider the effectiveness of the corrective actions taken by the auditee to address any nonconformities identified during the audit1. Therefore, when making a recommendation to the audit programme manager, an ISMS auditor should consider the nature and severity of the nonconformities and the proposed corrective actions.
Based on the scenario above, the auditor should recommend certification after their approval of the proposed corrective action plan and recommend that the findings can be closed out at a surveillance audit in 1 year. The auditor should provide the following justification for their recommendation:
* Justification: This recommendation is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditee has only two minor nonconformities and one opportunity for improvement, which do not indicate a significant or systemic failure of their ISMS. A minor nonconformity is defined as a failure to achieve one or more requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or a situation which raises significant doubt about the ability of an ISMS process to achieve its intended output, but does not affect its overall effectiveness or conformity2. An opportunity for improvement is defined as a suggestion for improvement beyond what is required by ISO/IEC 27001:20222. Therefore, these findings do not prevent or preclude certification, as long as they are addressed by appropriate corrective actions within a reasonable time frame. The auditor should approve the proposed corrective action plan before recommending certification, to ensure that it is realistic, achievable, and effective. The auditor should also recommend that the findings can be closed out at a surveillance audit in 1 year, to verify that the corrective actions have been implemented and are working as intended.
The other options are not valid recommendations for the audit programme manager, as they are either too lenient or too strict for the given scenario. For example:
* Recommend certification immediately: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor ignores or accepts the nonconformities, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO
19011:20182, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems. It also contradicts the requirement of ISO/IEC 17021-1:20151, which requires the certification body to consider the effectiveness of the corrective actions taken by the auditee before making a certification decision.
* Recommend that a full scope re-audit is required within 6 months: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor overreacts or exaggerates the nonconformities, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO 19011:20182. It also contradicts the requirement of ISO/IEC 17021-1:
20151, which requires the certification body to determine whether a re-audit is necessary based on the nature and extent of nonconformities and other relevant factors. A full scope re-audit is usually reserved for major nonconformities or multiple minor nonconformities that indicate a serious or widespread failure of an ISMS.
* Recommend that an unannounced audit is carried out at a future date: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor distrusts or doubts the auditee's commitment or capability to implement corrective actions, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO 19011:20182. It also contradicts the requirement of ISO/IEC 17021-1:20151, which requires the certification body to conduct unannounced audits only under certain conditions, such as when there are indications of serious problems with an ISMS or when required by sector-specific schemes.
* Recommend that a partial audit is required within 3 months: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor imposes or prescribes a specific time frame or scope for verifying corrective actions, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO 19011:20182. It also contradicts the requirement of ISO/IEC 17021-1:20151, which requires the certification body to determine whether a partial audit is necessary based on the nature and extent of nonconformities and other relevant factors.
A partial audit may be appropriate for minor nonconformities, but the time frame and scope should be agreed upon with the auditee and based on the proposed corrective action plan.
References: ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 - Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems - Part 1: Requirements, ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems

NEW QUESTION # 225
What is the relationship between data and information?

A. Data is structured information.
B. Information is the meaning and value assigned to a collection of data.

Answer: B

Explanation:
The relationship between data and information is that information is the meaning and value assigned to a collection of data. Data is a set of facts, figures, symbols or characters that can be processed by a computer or other means. Data by itself has no inherent meaning or context. Information is data that has been processed, organized, interpreted or presented in a way that makes it useful or meaningful for a specific purpose or audience. Information can be used to convey knowledge, support decision making or communicate messages. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 defines data as "representation of facts, concepts or instructions in a formalized manner suitable for communication, interpretation or processing by humans or by automatic means" (see clause 3.12) and information as "meaningful data" (see clause 3.25). Reference: [CQI & IRCA Certified ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Training Course], ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, What is Data and Information?

NEW QUESTION # 226
......

We have always taken care to provide our customers with the very best. So we provide numerous benefits along with our PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam exam study material. We provide our customers with the demo version of the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Questions to eradicate any doubts that may be in your mind regarding the validity and accuracy. You can test the product before you buy it.

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Valid Braindumps Files: https://www.examdumpsvce.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-valid-exam-dumps.html

NOW ENROLLING FOR TEST SERIES I.C.S.E. 2023 -24 STD VIII IX AND X

Student's Favourite Academy

Location

Call Us

Jim Reed Jim Reed

Biography

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Latest Dumps Sheet - ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Valid Braindumps Files

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Valid Braindumps Files & ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Clear Exam

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam Sample Questions (Q221-Q226):

SEARCH FOR

COURSE

Other Pages

Quick Links

Contact Info

Opening Hours